Hollywood has always confused me. They have perfectly good source material but often decide to move away from this. This doesn't just apply to Comics. In the past everyone always complained how the book was better than the movie, or which version of The Shining was best. Heck, Hollywood has even taken liberties with stories based on true events. Then again, I can understand how writers, directors, and producers want to stamp their individuality on what is, to them, a work of art. As such I will show you some of the differences in the comic book movies, and where I can, explain why these exist.The Fantastic Four
Because this movie is one of many with a reboot, I will be detailing the differences in 3 parts. The original movie, the sequel, and the Reboot. These 3 movies remind me of the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
The original movie was released in 2005. With only a few core differences in the movie from the comics, one could almost say this was "the Bad". Dealing with the origin story of the FF, a few changes were made which mostly made sense and really only affected Doom:
- Victor von Doom was included on the origin
- The FF were no longer accidentally bombarded by cosmic rays whilst flying, but rather went up to purposefully study a cloud of cosmic gas
- Doom was also affected by the cloud.
- Cloud Galactus
- Inclusion of Doctor Doom
- Destruction of Galactus
Lastly, we have "The Ugly". The reboot was universally panned by critics. Several rewrites and director changes resulted in the movie being almost unwatchable. The changes in this movie are so numerous that it is almost not even related to the comics (except that the four people gain the respective powers of the FF). This film changed the origin story, Doctor Doom, the family bond of Johnny and Sue, included the military, changed Ben Grimm's Yancy Street origins, and much more. If you want to ease into the comics, don't watch this one.











